RE: stds-802-mobility: Fwd: [802SEC] UPDATE: URL Link for 802.11 PARs For Consideration by the SEC
Jerry et al:
Sorry, have been out of action again due to wife's illness.
I have just noted this from Joanne (re. the TG .p in 802.11). I fully agree
with this point she makes, and would also remark that this terminology (ITS)
also dovetails v. well into that used already on this subject within the
ITU-R. I support her proposed action to argue to 802.11 that they use this
sensible, extant terminology for their new TG that would kill at least two
birds with one small stone, so to speak. As far as I am aware, the ITS term
is widely used in all three ITU Regions already (and it doesn't contain, or
make reference to, the C-word.... :-) )
BR, Dave James
PS The c-word is of course ..... Convergence ........
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Joanne
Wilson
Sent: 17 February 2004 15:22
To: Jerry1upton@aol.com; stds-802-mobility@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-802-mobility: Fwd: [802SEC] UPDATE: URL Link for 802.11
PARs For Consideration by the SEC
Jerry,
I reviewed the various PARs and don't see any that impinge on the work of
802.20. However, the title of project, "Wireless Access for the Vehicular
Environment" (provisionally 802.11 Task Group p), could give the impression
that there is an overlap. If others in 802.20 agree, we could propose that
they use a different title for the project. One option could be, "Wireless
Access for Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Applications".
Personally, I think they would also benefit in having a title that more
clearly and accurately reflects their purpose.
Best regards,
Joanne
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
Jerry1upton@aol.com
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 1:54 PM
To: stds-802-mobility@ieee.org
Subject: stds-802-mobility: Fwd: [802SEC] UPDATE: URL Link for 802.11 PARs
For Consideration by the SEC
All,
The 802.11 Working Group has four PARs that will be reviewed and voted on by
the 802 Executive Committee at the March Plenary. Please review and provide
any comments. If there are specific items that warrant a discussion directly
with an 802.11 representative, then we can request a representative and add
to our agenda for March. Regards, Jerry Upton Chair, IEEE 802.20