Again, I favor moving the 802.20 plenary to 1:00 pm. I see no
reason wasting time in the joint wireless plenary listening to discussions
that
are of no interest to us in 802.20.
Best regards,
Joanne
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Robert
D. Love
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 9:51 AM
To: Jerry Upton; stds-802-mobility@ieee.org
Subject: Re: stds-802-mobility: March agenda
All, whether you are for or against moving the opening 802.20 plenary at
1:00pm rather than at 4:00pm, please make your preference known by a quick
email to this reflector if you haven't already done so. Dawn needs to know
what our Monday afternoon meeting room requirements are by this Friday, so
Jerry needs to make a decision by then and let Dawn know.
Jerry, when you have made the final decision please email Dawn (either way)
copying the reflector so that we can plan based on the available meeting
time.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Robert D. Love
President, LAN Connect Consultants
7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
email: rdlove@ieee.org Fax: 208 978-1187
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Mollenauer" <jmollenauer@technicalstrategy.com>
To: <stds-802-mobility@ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:15 PM
Subject: stds-802-mobility: March agenda
To 802.20 participants:
I'd like to add my support to Bob Love's proposal that we start the
82.20 meeting immediately after lunch on Monday. The so-called wireless
plenary may be beneficial to 802.11 and 802.15 people, but there is
little that goes on that is as important to us as moving our own
standard forward. There is a full plenary (if that is not too redundant
a phrase) on Monday morning where issues of interest to all groups are
expected to be shared and milestones reported. This does not have to be
done over in more detail right afterward at a wireless meeting.
Making the wireless plenary count toward attendance credit is a bad
idea. The full plenary has never been counted toward attendance and
there is little justification to do so in this case. It is bad to be
delayed in reaching our goal, and it is worse to be forced to sit
through two hours of mostly-irrelevant material during the delay.
Jim Mollenauer