Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802-20-GENERAL:] Schedule issues



Jim, Al, and Val,
You are correct that the 802.20 Work Plan was not revised in the September Interim. There was no vote by the working group members. The update that I presented has not replaced 802.20-PD-07r1 that is posted as a permanent Working Document. Any change to a permanent document does require a voted approval.
The draft minutes correctly state the proposed updated Work Plan was discussed and noted by the group and included in the minutes for information. I created and discussed the potential update to the work plan in response to an email from the Paul Nikolich, Chair of 802, asking me to remind the group that our PAR will "time out" at the end of 2006. Paul expressed a concern that the group was at risk of not completing a standard before the expiration date of the PAR.
There is no linkage between the work plan discussion and the approval of technology selection process at the September session.
Since there may be confusion on the wording in the draft minutes, I suggest we revise the minutes. Your inputs on a proposed revision to the draft the minutes are clearly welcome.
I will await your inputs and then I will work with the recording secretary to create and post a revision to the minutes.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
Chair 802.20
 
In a message dated 10/19/2005 2:24:26 PM Central Standard Time, jmollenauer@TECHNICALSTRATEGY.COM writes:
Jerry:

A number of us have had a concern with the schedule as announced at the
September meeting.  A detailed letter is attached.

With regards,
Jim Mollenauer

802-20lettertoUpton.pdf