| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
In the high-level agenda as posted on the 802.20 web site, you have planned to adjourn the meeting on March 7, Tuesday afternoon. However, the number of contributions is unknown at this time. What if there is a larger number of contributions than we are able to discuss in the time allocated in the current agenda, i.e., 1 hour on Monday, 3.5 hours on Tuesday morning and 2.5 hours on Tuesday afternoon? Would you plan to continue the meeting on Wednesday in that case?
As
some other WG members have previously inquired, would you please let us know
the process and plan for the ballot resolution committee (BRG)? Would you
expect this group to have face-to-face meetings or teleconferences until all
comments are resolved? When would be the deadline for resolving the comments
for the first letter ballot?
Best regards,
Anna.
From: Jerry1upton@AOL.COM
[mailto:Jerry1upton@AOL.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:30 PM
To: STDS-802-MOBILITY@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802-20-GENERAL:] Corrected High Agenda for March Plenary
& Contributions
Dear Steve
and Anna Tee,
Thank you for your inputs on the
agenda.
However, my views are the same as
previously stated. That it is an unfair burden to schedule a two day recess at
the Plenary and have individuals wait for a status of the letter ballot for two
days when the status can be sent by email. This is a poor use of individuals’
time. The ballot does not close until midnight Wednesday. Given the expected
number of comments and possible last minute ballot returns, a status would not
even be possible until the sometime on late Thursday afternoon. It is not clear
what work would the group do based upon a summary status. I am sure we will
need a recirculation of the ballot.
Therefore I will not amendment the
agenda and extend the time.
Regards,
Jerry
Upton
In a
message dated 2/10/2006 1:44:14 PM Central Standard Time, steve.patzer@INTEL.COM
writes:
From business economics
perspective there is value in the group using the time alotted Mon thru Thur to
get work done as a group FTF. I do not understand why on any grounds the
chair of a IEEE group would resist requests by the members to work together
when they are onsite and willing. Please respect the requests from the
multiple companies.
Best regards
Steve Patzer
From: Lai-King Tee
[mailto:a.tee@samsung.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:54 AM
To: STDS-802-MOBILITY@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802-20-GENERAL:] Corrected High Agenda for March Plenary
& Contributions
Dear Jerry,
As the WG members have
already traveled all the way to the meeting, we should try to start working on
ballot comment resolution on Thursday, March 9, after the close of ballot on
Wednesday. At the very least, some meeting time slots should be allocated to
the ballot resolution committee to start planning their work schedule.
Best regards,
Anna.
From: Jerry1upton@AOL.COM
[mailto:Jerry1upton@AOL.COM]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 2:58 AM
To: STDS-802-MOBILITY@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802-20-GENERAL:] Corrected High Agenda for March Plenary
& C ontribution...
Dear
Naftali,
Thank
you for your thought inputs on the agenda.
However,
my view is that it is an unfair burden to schedule a two day recess at the
Plenary. Having people wait for a status of the letter ballot for two days when
the status can be sent by email seems a poor use of peoples time. The ballot
does not close until midnight Wednesday. Given the expect number of comments
and possible last minute ballot returns, a status would not even be possible
until the sometime on late Thursday afternoon. It is not clear what work would
the group do based upon a summary status. I am sure we will need a
recirculation of the ballot.
Therefore
I will not amendment the agenda and extend the time.
Regards,
Jerry
Upton
Chair,
802.20
In a message dated 2/9/2006 7:56:40
AM Central Standard Time, naftali.chayat@ALVARION.COM writes:
Dear Jerry,
I am a bit surprised by the fact
that the agenda of 802.20 terminates on Tuesday. Since the ballot closes on
Wednesday, I believe that Thursday (which is still within the IEEE802 plenary
meeting date range) should be spent on discussing the outcome of the ballot,
its implications and planning of next steps. Even if the outcome of this ballot
would have been known in advance (which I assume is not) it would still be more
appropriate to take actions related to the ballot outcome after the ballot, not
before.
My recommendation would, therefore
be:
1) add to the agenda (on Thursday)
the topic of actions and planning related to the ballot outcome
2) schedule meetings for the whole
week, and if you run out of work, take the Tuesday and Wednesday off.
Best Regards,
Naftali Chayat
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry1upton@AOL.COM [mailto:Jerry1upton@AOL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:08 PM
To: STDS-802-MOBILITY@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802-20-GENERAL:] Corrected High Agenda for March Plenary &
Contributions due Feb 24
All,
I corrected the High Level
Agenda for the March Plenary that was posted earlier.
My apology for the typing errors.
http://www.ieee802.org/20/Meeting%20Agenda/Proposed%20High%20Level%20Agenda%20Mar%2006.doc
The Working Letter Ballot closes at
midnight on Wednesday during the plenary. Given that timing and the lack of
other business, I assume we will have a short session.
Contributions are due February 24,
2006.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
Chair, 802.20