RE: +++ SEC BALLOT #2 ON FCC SUBMISION (DS Test)
Jim,
I approve this one too.
Thanks. Vic
> ----------
> From: Jim Carlo[SMTP:jcarlo@ti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 16:47
> To: IEEE802
> Cc: Hayes, Vic (Vic)
> Subject: +++ SEC BALLOT #2 ON FCC SUBMISION (DS Test)
>
> <<File: 9210r48a.pdf>>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> SEC OFFICIAL EMAIL BALLOT 802.0/28Sept1999
>
> Issue Date: 28Sept1999 Closing Date: 1October1999
> Moved By: Vic Hayes
> Seconded By: Bob Heile
>
> Move: Authorize responding from IEEE 802 to the FCC NPRM (Docket No.
> 99-231)
> with doc.: 11-99/210-r4 (in principal). Approved by 802.11 EMAIL ballot:
> 69-Yes, 2-No, 3-Abstain.
>
> This letter states that "The Committee supports the CW jammer test,
> together with the additional requirement for mathematical justification
> for
> systems utilizing codes with less than 10 chips as proposed in paragraph
> 15
> and advises the Commission of our concerns regarding an alternative
> Gaussian
> noise test as proposed in paragraph 14. Members of the Committee have
> performed extensive analysis and technical trade-off studies that were
> discussed at the IEEE 802.11 Interim Meeeting (Santa Rosa, 13-17 September
> 1999) to ensure that its 2.4 GHz high data rate waveform adheres to the
> processing Gain requirement of at least 10dB.2 As a result of these
> studies, it has concluded that the processing Gain test using the CW
> jamming
> test as proposed in paragraph 15 of the Notice is a valid method to
> confirm
> the processing gain requirement.
>
> Approval is requested for this letter (in principal) to allow for editing
> by
> Vic Hayes, Bob Heile and Jim Carlo based on various comments (including
> IEEE
> staff) being provided. The letter needs to be submitted to the FCC by
> 4October.
>
> If you want to see the document 99/209 in its entirety, please go to the
> web
> at:
> http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Documents/index.html#FCC_NPRM_99-231
>