Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Rule change needed ;-)



At 09:34 AM 10/26/00 +0100, Tony Jeffree wrote:
At 00:50 26/10/00 -0700, Geoff Thompson wrote:
Tony


At 09:09 AM 10/25/00 +0100, Tony Jeffree wrote:

You may be interested to know that our current operating rules require us to pass all Email ballots.  I quote from 3.4.2.1:

"A majority of eligible voting SEC members must vote approve in order for the ballot to pass."

Is that in alphabetical order?

What other order would you propose? ;-)

Regards,
Tony


Looks like our motion on cookies is in good shape, Geoff ;-)

Regards,
Tony

Geoff

As the "order"ing is obviously required, but not specified in the rules it would seem to me that it is the duty of the chair to specify the "order". Other possibilities might be:
        age
        beauty
        Working Group number
        Seniority
        Clockwise seating order at the last meeting
        Counter clockwise seating at the penultimate meeting

The possibilities are endless

Geoff