RE: [802SEC] Get IEEE 802 status update
From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:12 PM
Cc: 'Walker, Jerry'
Subject: RE: [802SEC] Get IEEE 802 status update
"To immediately release the March 2002 LMSC funds held in escrow for
the 'Get IEEE 802' program, with the understanding that the SEC will
consider approval, at its July 2002 meeting, of an agreement with the
IEEE-SA based on the terms outlined in the document 'Get IEEE 802
Program Agreement' (created 4 June 2002, 1:45 pm)."
At 1:01 PM -0700 02/06/04, Grow, Bob wrote:
>I would second except for the phrase "intends to approve". That makes this
>motion a tacit acceptance of the agreement as written. We will be
>considering endorsing the agreement in July. Also, the motion should
>reverence a later revision that includes the editorial corrections
>recommended by Paul and I as well as Paul's substantive additions.
>From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:email@example.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:10 AM
>Cc: 'Walker, Jerry'
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] Get IEEE 802 status update
>"To immediately release the March 2002 LMSC funds held in escrow for
>the 'Get IEEE 802' program, with the understanding that the SEC
>intends to approve, at its July 2002 meeting, an agreement with the
>IEEE-SA based on the terms outlined in the document 'Get IEEE 802
>Program Agreement' (created 4 June 2002, 10:34 am)."
>Rationale: I agree with Bob and Bill that we need a more formalized
>agreement, and I don't think the one that Jerry submitted this
>morning is sufficient. However, the Chair is seeking a quick action
>on the March 2002 funds, and I think that the progress reflected in
>the Task Group discussion justifies this. The Chair has not asked for
>a longer-term commitment right now.
>At 11:11 AM -0400 02/06/04, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>>Thanks for your comments on the intial draft document. Jerry Walker is
>>revising the document as per those comments and I will post the new
>>by the end of the day today. Of those that commented, (Roger M, Bob G,
>>Q, Buzz R) I would like to get a mover and seconder to initiate an SEC
>>ballot on a motion similar to the following:
>>"Move that the IEEE 802 SEC immediately release the March 2002 funds held
>>escrow to continue the Get IEEE 802 program as decribed in the attached
>>document "Get IEEE 802" program agreement"
>>after you get a chance to review the modified documents.
>>My objective is to close the balloting on such a motion by Monday June 11
>>5PM EDT so that I have the results in to discuss with Jim Carlo and Ben
>>Johnson at next week's Standards Board meeting in Piscataway.
>>Chair, IEEE802 LAN/MAN Standards Project
> >email: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >cell: 857.205.0050
> >mail: 18 Bishops Lane, Lynnfield, MA 01940