RE: [802SEC] Review of 2003 802 CD-ROM content
I thought about sending that question too, but decided not to
bring it up.
To the extent that we produce the CD so that 802 standards
developers will be able to refer to the earlier standards
to see how a particular problem was handled, to get examples
of text for various situations, etc., the withdrawn standards
are still useful for this purpose.
It might be a good idea, assuming we include the withdrawn
standards, to make sure it is clear which documents are withdrawn.
(One way would be to put them under a separate Withdrawn directory.)
That would prevent some possible mistakes like referencing a
From: Geoff Thompson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Bob O'Hara
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Review of 2003 802 CD-ROM content
Is it our intention (or not) to include withdrawn (but presumably not
superceded) standards in this collection?
I'm actually willing to go either way on this.
At 03:43 PM 8/28/2002 -0700, Bob O'Hara wrote:
>Please review the list of documents, below, that are to be included on
>the 2003 edition of the 802 CD-ROM. If a document is not on the list,
>it will not appear on the CD-ROM. Please let me know if you have any
>additions, deletions, or changes. Thanks for your attention to this!
>2003 802 Standards CD-ROM
>802 operating rules
>8802-5-1998 amd 1
>Current MIB text file
>Current SDL files(?)
>Black Storm Networks
>110 Nortech Parkway
>San Jose, CA 95134-2307
>Phone: +1 408 941 0500
>Mobile: +1 408 218 4025
>Fax: +1 810 277 4718