Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802SEC] Re: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom




Roger:

Looks like Mike beat me on the second.  I should warn you though I will probably oppose conditional approval for submission to RevCom if you are only allowing 10 days for Sponsor recirculation as outlined on your schedule (based on draft availability, I don't understand why the abreviated ballot time).

--Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Takefman [mailto:tak@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Paul Nikolich
Cc: Roger B. Marks; stds-802-sec@ieee.org; stds-802-16@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Re: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom



Second

mike

Paul Nikolich wrote:
> 
> Roger,
> 
> You'll need someone on the SEC to second the motion first.
> 
> If there is an SEC member that is willing to second the motion, please
> indicate that to me and Roger.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> --Paul
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
> To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>
> Cc: <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>; <stds-802-16@ieee.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:56 PM
> Subject: Request SEC Motion: P1802.16.1/D2 to RevCom
> 
> > Paul:
> >
> > I request that the following motion be entered as an SEC email ballot:
> >
> > MOTION: To forward IEEE P1802.16.1/D2-2002 ("Draft Standard for
> > Conformance to IEEE Standard 802.16 - Part 1: Protocol Implementation
> > Conformance Statements for 10-66 GHz WirelessMAN-SC Air Interface")
> > for Sponsor Ballot.
> >
> > Here is an explanation:
> >
> > The Working Group Letter Ballot results are clean. 802.16's Letter
> > Ballot #9 ("To forward IEEE P1802.16.1/D1-2002 for LMSC Sponsor
> > Ballot") ran from 21 Nov to 21 Dec. The results were:
> >
> > Approve: 41   Disapprove: 0   Approval Ratio: 100% [75% required]
> > Abstain: 8    Ballots: 49     Return Ratio:    59% [50% required]
> > Comments: 77
> >
> > Responses were developed by a Ballot Resolution Committee, and
> > P1802.16.1/D2 was issued. The comments, responses, and draft were
> > subject to 15-day Recirculation Ballot #9a (31 Dec 2002 - 14 Jan
> > 2003). No responses were received. Therefore, the ballot is closed
> > and final.
> >
> > For a full report of the Letter Ballot, see
> > <http://ieee802.org/16/tgc/C1/ballot09/report9.html>.
> >
> > I am asking for an email vote instead of waiting until the March
> > meeting because I believe that approval will give us an excellent
> > chance of making the 14 April RevCom deadline. Here is the schedule:
> >
> > http://ieee802.org/16/tgc/C1/schedule.html
> >
> > The Sponsor Ballot Group is already in place.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Roger

-- 
Michael Takefman              tak@cisco.com
Manager of Engineering,       Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399       cell:613-220-6991