RE: [802SEC] November Plenary survey results
Bill, I was referring to having the WG information along with the survey information, so you could see the skew between 802.3 preferences and 802.11 preferences. Collecting the info on the web-reg pages also insures you get only one vote per person too (unless they want to pay again to get an extra vote - which I would certainly encourage). :-)
Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing - SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
(425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:18 PM
To: Rigsbee, Everett O
Cc: Geoff Thompson; IEEE 802 SEC; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [802SEC] November Plenary survey results
The data that I have is in one table (Excel spreadsheet). What is time
consuming is the generation of the counting functions and the graphs.
"Rigsbee, Everett O" wrote:
> Bill, If we do a follow-up via the Web-Reg form for next time we will have all that data available in one table.
> Thanx, Buzz
> Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
> Boeing - SSG
> PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
> Seattle, WA 98124-2207
> (425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:06 PM
> To: Geoff Thompson
> Cc: IEEE 802 SEC; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Novenber Plenary survey results
> I would need membership numbers from the WGs/TAGs (which I don't have)
> to compute the relative response from each group. I could do the
> analysis for each WG/TWG or for groups of WGs/TAGs, but it would take a
> lot of time even if I did the analysis for only .3 and .11.
> The survey was nominally anonymous. So while some participants
> identified themselves, most did not. Therefore graphing question 13 for
> a group or groups that must be identified by name is not practical.
> Geoff Thompson wrote:
> > Bill-
> > The biggest thing that I see is that the responses are skewed towards .11
> > and away from .3.
> > It might be helpful to show %age response from the membership/attendance of
> > each group.
> > That is, the dot 11 management might want to take the survey results more
> > seriously than the dot 3 managment.
> > Also, perhaps a graph of question 13 responses from the group consisting of:
> > 802 Officers
> > WG officers
> > IEEE Staff
> > Conference organizers
> > Thanks for all of the work on this
> > Geoff
> > At 10:11 AM 3/6/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> > >All,
> > >
> > >Attached are the results of the survey that was conducted during the
> > >November 2002 Plenary in Kauai.
> > >
> > >Questions and comments?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >wlq
> > >