Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ TENTATIVE RESULTS-- Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom





Matthew Sherman
Vice Chair, IEEE 802
Technology Consultant
Communications Technology Research
AT&T Labs - Shannon Laboratory
Room B255, Building 103
180 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 971
Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971
Phone: +1 (973) 236-6925
Fax: +1 (973) 360-5877

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Nikolich []
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Paul Nikolich; IEEE802
Subject: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ TENTATIVE RESULTS-- Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom


Dear SEC members,

The ballot closes as of 6:30PM EDT May 1, 2003.   The tentative results are shown below.  If you did not vote, please cast your vote before the ballot closes.


 --Paul Nikolich

The tentative vote tally as of 4:30PM EDT April 30, 2003   is as follows:

 Vote categories:         DIS    DNV    APP    ABS
 01 Geoff Thompson             DNV
 02 Mat Sherman                    DNV
 03 Buzz Rigsbee                   DNV
 04 Bob O'Hara                                    APP
 05 Bill Quackenbush            DNV

 06 Tony Jeffree                                  APP
 07 Bob Grow                                      APP
 08 Stuart Kerry                        DNV
 00 Bob Heile                                       APP
 10 Roger Marks                                 APP
 11 Mike Takefman                             APP
 12 Carl Stevenson                             APP
 13 Jim Lansford                                 APP
                             total: -0-      -05-       -08-      -00-

 7 APPROVES required to PASS

----- Original Message -----

To: IEEE802

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 6:20 PM

Subject: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom


Dear SEC,

This is a 14 day SEC email ballot to make a determination on the below SEC motion to authorize forwarding 802.15.2 D9 to RevCom. 

Moved by Bob Heile, Seconded by Stuart Kerry

The email ballot opens on Thursday April 17, 2003 6:30PM EDT and closes Thursday May 1, 2003 6:30PM EDT.

Please direct your responses to the SEC reflector with a CC directly to me (


--Paul Nikolich

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Heile" <>
To: <>
Cc: <>; <>; <>;
<>; "bob Heile" <>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 7:08 AM
Subject: Move to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom

> Paul
> I would like to start a 10 day SEC email Letter Ballot.
> Having successfully completed Sponsor Ballot, Move to Forward 802.15.2
> Draft 9 to RevCom.
> Supporting documentation has been issued in previous emails to the SEC.
> moved:  Bob Heile
> second:  Stuart Kerry
> Bob Heile, Ph.D
> Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
> Chair, ZigBee Alliance
> 11 Louis Road
> Attleboro, MA  02703   USA
> Phone: 508-222-1393
> Mobile: 781-929-4832
> Fax:     508-222-0515
> email:

Supporting Documentation:

----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Heile
Cc: ;
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: [802SEC] Report on 15.2 Recirculation Ballot

The 15.2 Recirculation ballot closed on April 15. The results were:

1. This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement.
66 eligible people in this ballot group.
48 affirmative votes
1 negative votes with comments
0 negative votes without comments
7 abstention votes
56 votes received = 84% returned
12% abstention
2. The 75% affirmation requirement is being met.
48 affirmative votes
1 negative votes with comments
49 votes = 97% affirmative

We received one new affirmative and one of the no voters changed their vote
to affirmative.  The one remaining no vote was from the previous ballot and
was ruled then as not a valid technical comment and made part of the
recirculation. (copy below) There has been no response from that voter.

Given that there are no new no votes and no changes required to the draft,
I will be making a motion to the SEC, via a 10 day letter ballot,  to
forward Draft 9 to RevCom in time for the May 2 submission deadline.

Comment received on Draft 8 and recirculated with Draft 9:

CommenterName CommentType CommentID Clause Subclause Page Line
O'Farrell, Timothy      T               8               D       89
The source code of Appendix D is provided without a flow diagram schematic.
To enhance understanding and accessibility of the program material a flow
diagram schematic is required.
Include a flow diagram schematic of the source code presented in Appendix D.
The BRC does not know of any requirements to supply a flow diagram for code,
therefore one will not be created and included. BRC does not consider this a
technical comment on the draft, since it relates to a informative annex.