[802SEC] 3/14 LMSC Exec. Comm. Minutes
I have updated the minutes of the March Friday EC meeting to reflect
comments made by Jerry in the email below. The new minutes can be
The new minutes include bookmarks to the four changes I have made.
"Modification #1" is on line 22 of page 10 and addresses Jerry's comment
"Modification #2" is on line 24 of page 10 and addresses Jerry's
"Modification #3 is on line 5 of page 20 and addresses Jerry's comment
"Modification #4 is on line 22 of page 20 and addresses Jerry's comment
Please review these changes to the minutes and be prepared to vote on a
motion to approve these modified minutes at the opening meeting in
From: Jerry1upton@aol.com [mailto:Jerry1upton@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Matthew Sherman; email@example.com
Subject: Re: FW: [802SEC] 3/14 LMSC Exec. Comm. Minutes
Please disregard my comment number five on the minutes. Mark Klerer
explained the differences on the slides.
In a message dated 7/25/2003 3:42:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> Hi Everyone,
> For those who don't have it I am forwarding Jerry's comments on the
> minutes. I would suggest if anyone does have objections they should
> expressed early rather than waiting for the next meeting to be
> Matthew Sherman
> Vice Chair, IEEE 802
> Technology Consultant
> Communications Technology Research
> AT&T Labs - Shannon Laboratory
> Room B255, Building 103
> 180 Park Avenue
> P.O. Box 971
> Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971
> Phone: +1 (973) 236-6925
> Fax: +1 (973) 360-5877
> EMAIL: firstname.lastname@example.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry1upton@aol.com [mailto:Jerry1upton@aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [802SEC] 3/14 LMSC Exec. Comm. Minutes
> The following are my proposed corrections/additions to the March 14,
> 2003 LMSC Executive Committee meeting minutes.
> 1. On page 10, you did not finish a sentence. You wrote "Desire to
> continue with the current rules and declare a moratorium on" and the
> line ends.
> 2. On page 10, during the discussion where the above sentence is
> minuted, I make a statement as an observer. I stated that any proposed
> action that would retroactively change the membership status of 802.20
> people who left Dallas with a clear understanding that they were
> members would be unfair and inappropriate.
> 3. On page 20, it should noted that when I cover my qualifications, I
> did state I had given my support letter and biography to Paul before
> meeting. Also no committee members asked Paul if he had biographies or
> letters from either of the two elected vice chairs.
> 4. On page 20, during the discussion on the large number of people
> coming to the first 802.20 meeting, I stated my opinion was that the
> publicity on the new work group created significant interest and that,
> in my experience, many wireless companies do not send their experts or
> very many people until it becomes clear that work will really start on
> new standard.
> 5. Regarding the 802.20 Report of Session #1 slides, my notes indicate
> that the slides in minutes are not precisely the slides shown. For
> accuracy of the minutes, it is appropriate to include the
> slides as
> shown at the meeting without any cleanup.
> Jerry Upton