Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++EC Motion+++ To conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P



Approve.

Carl


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of
> Paul Nikolich
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 6:13 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Motion+++ To conditionally approve
> forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P
>
>
> Dear EC Members,
>
> This is a 10 day email ballot to make a determination on the
> following motion.  The ballot opens 6:30PM EDT 23 April 2004
> and closes 6:30PM EDT 3 May 2004.
>
> Motion:  To conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to
> RevCom under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P.
> Moved: Mike Takefman
> Second: Bob O'Hara.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul Nikolich
>
>
>
> Dear EC Members,
>
> In the preceding email, I detailed the results of our
> last recirculation ballot and our plan moving forward.
> I therefore make the following EC email ballot motion:
>
> Move to conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom
> under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P.
>
> May I have a second?
>
> cheers,
>
> mike
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Takefman" <tak@CISCO.COM>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 1:56 PM
> Subject: [802SEC] Result of 802.17 D3.2 Recirculation /
> Conditional Approval
>
>
> >
> > Dear EC Members,
> >
> > On April 21, 2004 the CRG of 802.17 met to resolve comments on the
> > Sponsor Ballot Recirculation of P802.17 D3.2. The
> recirculation ballot
> > closed on April 16, 2004.
> >
> > I regret to inform the EC that I believe we have failed to meet the
> > conditions set forth in Procedure 10. Specifically, (item
> 4) we have
> > chosen to make some changes to the draft that do constitute
> technical
> > changes (and are detailed below).
> >
> > That being said, as the volume of comments were down substantially
> > from previous ballots and the operational technical change
> corrects a
> > rather obscure corner case I will be requesting the EC to grant
> > conditional approval again under Procedure 10 via an email
> ballot (to
> > follow after this email).
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> >
> > P802.17 D3.2 Recirc Statistics: Ballot closed on April 16, 2004.
> >
> > 76 Approve 4 Disapprove 5 Abstains = 95% Affirmative
> >
> > No new disapprove voters:
> >
> > Note: One of the disapprove voters had flipped his vote via
> email to
> > me but did not submit a new ballot. Therefore the Approval
> ratio could
> > be as high as 96% (77/3/5).
> >
> > 67 comments were received from 7 commentors:
> > Only 1 negative balloter submitted comments (30 comments)
> >
> > 30 Editorial comments
> > 9  Technical Binding comments from an existing negative voter 28
> > Technical Non Binding comments from approving voters
> >
> > No new valid disapprove votes or comments on new issues
> that were not
> > resolved to the satisfaction of the disapprove voter.
> >
> > 5 unresolved comments from a negative voter. All comments
> were against
> > non-changebar text. 4 were restatements of issues raised in
> previous
> > ballots, 1 was an editorial change (to reformat a
> > table) marked as a technical issue.
> >
> > Technical/Operational Change:
> > -An error was found in the protection state machine. A corner
> > case/race condition that is highly unlikely to occur in a
> real system
> > but is theoretically possible was fixed.
> >
> > Technical/Non Operational Change:
> > -IETF review of the MIB found that a few initialization values /
> > indentifiers were incorrect and caused MIB compilation to fail.
> >
> > Pseudo-Technical / Editorial Change:
> > -inconsistent use of units for 1 variable. One variable was
> marked as
> > being in micro-seconds (with its default being 1000), whereas the
> > other related variables in the same state machine used
> milliseconds.
> > -3 changes in existing PICs statements -2 optional PICs statements
> > added -missing references
> > -other minor editorial fixes
> >
> >
> > Moving Forward:
> >
> >
> http://www.ieee802.org/17/member/draftballots/> d3_3/index.htm
contains
> > the latest draft and all associated documentation.
> >
> > Draft 3.3 and associated comments were created and forwarded to SA
> > Staff for Recirculation Ballot. Balloting started on date April 23,
> > with end date May 8.
> >
> > Assuming that the EC grants conditional approval for 802.17 D3.3:
> >
> > A teleconference will be held Monday May 10th, 2004 to
> review comments
> > / determine if we can submit to RevCom.
> >
> > Recirculation ballot will be started May 13th (as appropriate).
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > mike
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector.
> > This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
>

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.