Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Of Ballots and Telecons....



Pat,

 

Ouch!  You caught me bad on that one.  I had intended that all the comment resolution session would be before the Plenary.  I’ll be adjusting the schedule accordingly.  Based on existing feedback to date, I’ll be going with a Thursday schedule.

 

Mat

 

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com


From: pat_thaler@agilent.com [mailto:pat_thaler@agilent.com]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 1:16 PM
To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA); STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [802SEC] Of Ballots and Telecons....

 

Matt,

 

Thursdays are better for me than Fridays though I have a problem with March 10 as it would conflict with the T10 plenary. I would be willing to go as early as 10 AM EST (7 AM PST) - if the start is 8 AM PST. I'll probably be doing the call from home anyway.

 

I have another problem with the proposed dates. I notice that one of the meetings is after the plenary and the first meeting is well after (~3 weeks) the current two open ballots close. There are two problems with this. Given the amount of stuff before us, it would be nice to get all of these ballots resolved before the plenary if possible.  Meeting for that long after the ballots close will mean that many of us will have to refresh our memories on the issues to be resolved. It would be more efficient to meet closer to the time the ballots close and before the plenary.

 

In regard to the usefulness of teleconferences, once one adapts to using them they can work pretty well - especially when the parties know each other from face to face meetings so that they recognize voices. I've been involved in consortia that use them heavily for specification development. They are sometimes painful (particularly when I have spent 6 hours continuously on them), but much less than having to travel. Travel to standards meetings often cuts into my weekends and evenings. The occasional teleconference to avoid travel or make travel more effective is fine with me.

 

Regards,

Pat

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]On Behalf Of Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Sent: Saturday, 08 January, 2005 4:53 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Of Ballots and Telecons....

Tony,

 

Other organizations I believe do manage to conduct business via telecon across multiple continents.  Generally it means making a commitment to inconvenience ourselves from time to time, and have a rotating Time schedule.  Right now we are only dealing with 2 continents, so I think a fixed schedule can be made to work.  I’m willing to move the calls to Thursdays from 11 AM to 1 PM EST if it helps.

 

Does anyone else have comment on this before I move the meetings?

 

Thanks,

 

Mat

 

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com


From: Tony Jeffree [mailto:tony@jeffree.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:55 AM
To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Of Ballots and Telecons....

 

Matt -

Because of my schedule, it would need to finish before 5pm on a Friday (and preferably earlier than that). However, that clearly gives the West Coast a problem. (Although I'm afraid the real problem is attempting to use telecons at all - see below).

Any other day of the week (Mon through Thurs) I wouldn't have a problem with the timings you propose, as I am often still working at that time, although my preference would be to shift them back 1/2 hour to finish by 6PM UK time.

In my view, if we think we are going to be credible as an International SDO, we had better not get entrenched in *any* working pattern that effectively disenfranchises participation outside of the North American timezones. For this reason, I don't believe that telecons are a generally acceptable tool - as a means of dealing with "firefighting" type problems (such as the discussions around 802.11/Chinese delegation), they have their place, but I have to say I am concerned about their increasing use for transacting "normal" business, both in SEC and the WGs. At some point in the future, we may well have SEC members from Australasia (for example) that are going to find it totally impossible to participate in such meetings; we must already have that problem with the present WG use of telecons. I am therefore surprised that we haven't already seen pushback in (for example) 802.11, where they are in frequent use at the moment.

Regards,
Tony

At 14:31 08/01/2005, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:

Tony,
 
Because of my work schedule I’m trying to find something on Friday.  I’m open to other suggestions.  The problem is the west coast.  I’m also open to an alternating schedule.  It is early enough I can still change the time of the announce meeting.  Please suggest….
 
Thanks,
 
Mat
 

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com


From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 4:35 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Of Ballots and Telecons....
 
Mat -

Slight problem with the time zone calcs there - it is Fridays, 4:30 - 6:30 UK time, but that doesn't help me much. Still a very unfriendly time for me.

Regards,
Tony

At 08:46 08/01/2005, Tony Jeffree wrote:

Mat -

In the spirit of internationalization that seems to be high in our consciousness at the moment, I strongly object to your choice of time for telecons (that works out as Friday, 6:30PM through 8:30 PM UK time), which is a maximally unfriendly time for me, being well after normal working hours at the start of a weekend. If the timing remains there, my chances of making any of these telecons is very slim indeed, so I regard that choice as effectively disenfranchising me from the process.

Regards,
Tony



 

At 05:38 08/01/2005, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:


Folks,

I realize I’m pummeling everyone with all these ballots and telecons.  I do want to be as accommodating as possible.  For various reasons, Fridays work out best for me to hold these meetings.  I chose lunch time because I felt it was a reasonable compromise between all the time zones. I am open to other times if people feel they would work better.  Please let me know if there are preferences.

One last point.  I notice that some EC members seem never to participate in the P&P revision process.  I was hoping that the telecom format would ease that issue somewhat.  I’ve also suggested sending delegates to the comment resolution to help ease the load.  If people chose not to participate, I think it’s bad but I can accept it.  What I really don’t want is that we spend months discussing things and resolving things and then someone who didn’t participate in the process objects at the final vote.  I am hoping that people who choose not to participate will give those that did the benefit of the doubt and not block their work when the final vote comes. I am also open to other ideas for making the process more convenient and easier for everyone.  Right now, this is the best I can come up with given the goals we have set. Please let me know if you have comments on the process.

Regards,

Mat

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.

Senior Member Technical Staff

BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR

Office: +1 973.633.6344

email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

Regards,
Tony
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

Regards,
Tony
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

Regards,
Tony

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.