I agree with Bob's comments.
Though I vote disapprove now, I will also change my vote to approve if the changes are made.
In a message dated 2/8/2005 12:11:08 AM Central Standard Time, bob@AIRESPACE.COM writes:
Mat,
I vote disapprove on this matter. I am willing to change my vote to approve, with the following changes:
1. changing the decision of procedural matters put by the chair from a majority to a vote as required by Robert's Rules. Closing debate, changing P&P, and other matters require more than a simple majority. The LMSC P&P should not overrule RRO in these matters.
2. the vote on a directed position could be clearer. please consider new language like "a directed position is formed by a motion stating the exact wording of the directed position being approved in the WG by more than 75% of the voting members voting yea and nay on the motion."
-Bob
Dear EC members,
Attached you will find the text for an LMSC P&P revision ballot on WG Voting Rules. This ballot was approved at the Friday November 19, 2004 EC meeting. The text is identical to that presented at the meeting. The purpose and rationale for the ballot are as given in the attached ballot document.
Ballot Duration: 1/8/2005 - 2/8/2005 @ 11:59 PM EST
WG/TAG chairs, please distribute this P&P revision ballot to your groups, and invite them to comment through you.
Thanks & Regards,
Mat
<<802.0-WG_Voting_Rules-P&P_Revision_ballot.pdf>>
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.