| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
1. Timeliness of standards development vrs. fiduciary
oversight.
Basically the problems I have discussed with some of the EC
off-line:
a) the requirement to
get BOG approval for sponsorship (e.g., meeting
host);
b) impossibility
of submitting meeting
location, date and subject one to two years in advance without serious impact to project
schedules..
2. Policy on offensive project
numbers.
Do we have one, if not, should we, and if so how do we
handle cultural sensitivity as part of our international outreach?
Background -- At the current rate, we will wrap the alphabet in a couple years,
though obsene suffixes are hopefully further away. More than one person
has noted that we will encounter decisions that range for amusing (some of which we encountered during the current
pass through the alphabet) to offensive on the next pass (ba, bj, bm, bs, etc. in
American culture, but I'm at a loss for most other
cultures). From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:38 PM To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [802SEC] 802 Task Force Agenda Dear EC members,
I'm putting together the draft agenda for the 802
Task Force for the March Plenary Session. If there is another topic you
would like covered, please let me know and I'll try to add it to the
agenda.
Regards,
--Paul
draft agenda for 802 Task Force March
2005
1) ISO/IEC, IEEE SA 'relationship' and strategic
impact on 802 LMSC
2) Funded Services Project Updates: On-line traing
and P&P
3) Discussion on Entity Balloting: review draft of
'corporate procedures' developed by Law and Booth
4) Complementary Copies: GOT and KK to report on
their suggestions for alternative 'trophies'
5) MyBallot beta testing update: Grow to
report
|