Re: [802SEC] 40 MHz 11n
Steve,
This is an important issue--as you have already begun, please continue to
make the stakeholders aware of the issue. Even though a Coexistence
Assurance document is not formally required, the 802.19 Coexistence TAG
should provide a means for the various points of view to be aired and
possibly resolved. Can you set up a meeting (either telephonic or
face-to-face) to bring the parties together to enable discussion? Will the
stakeholders participate?
Perhaps you can get agreement among the stakeholders to create a CA document
even though the rules don't require it.
Regards,
--Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shellhammer, Steve" <sshellha@QUALCOMM.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 1:05 PM
Subject: [802SEC] 40 MHz 11n
Paul,
As you can see there are some strong concerns from other
working groups on this topic. There have been emails on the 19/15/11
reflectors so you may not have seen all of them.
Since the 11n PAR was earlier than the 802 coexistence rules
the TAG does not vote on this draft. At one point 802.11 produced a CA
document based on your direction, but once it was ruled by the EC that
the WG did was not required to produce a CA document it was dropped.
So it sounds like there are people who are going to vote
against this motion based on this issue. It sounds like it will come up
at the EC when the draft is ready to go to Sponsor ballot. I am not
sure when that will be.
Do you have any suggestions on how to deal with this issue?
Since these coexistence issues cut across WGs it is important that the
EC members are aware of it, so I copied the EC.
Regards,
Steve
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.