Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] Comments on 802d and 802.1CQ

All

Here are my comments on the 802.1 PARs.

P802d

Editorial: The title in the PAR has P802802d, which is likely a typo.
It appears correctly in the NesCom agenda.

5.2.b While the acronym is spelled out in 8.1, my preference would be
better to expand URN in the scope as it is a key term for this
standard.

1.2.4 What is the meaining of "~1997"?  Delete "~1997" as the RFC
number is sufficient to identify the document.

802.1CQ
 - Editorial: 5.2 Join the lines in the Scope statement.

 - 5.2: The scope is pretty light on description.  Later in the
   purpose it refers to "Peer-to-peer address claiming and address
   server capabilities will be included to serve the needs of smaller
   (e.g. home) and larger (e.g. industrial plants and building
   control) networks."  Add to the scope "Peer-to-peer address
   claiming and address server capabilities are defined.

James Gilb

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.