| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
|   Andrew,   To quote your link: "Townsend and his team analyzed known reinfection and immunological data from the close viral relatives of
 SARS-CoV-2 that cause 'common colds' — along with immunological data from SARS-CoV-1 and Middle East
 Respiratory Syndrome. Leveraging evolutionary principles, the team was able to model the risk of COVID-19
 reinfection over time." So they made a model. Models tend to suffer from the bias of their makers and some of them are just garbage (e.g. the Imperial College one). Better to pay attention to studies that actually worked with people who had the virus and recovered.
 Like this one. Here's a study of COVID that shows the opposite of what the model you referred to does: https://www.science.org/content/article/having-sars-cov-2-once-confers-much-greater-immunity-vaccine-vaccination-remains-vital   Dan. -- "the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." – Marcus Aurelius On 10/6/21, 4:51 PM, "***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** on behalf of Andrew Myles (amyles)" <STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org on behalf of
00000b706269bb8b-dmarc-request@ieee.org> wrote: G’day Steve,   I agree that that we should follow the science …   
·        
A study reported in The Lancet Microbe reports, “Reinfection can reasonably happen in three months or less. Therefore, those who have been naturally infected should get vaccinated. Previous infection alone can offer
 very little long-term protection against subsequent infections.” (see summary)   … which suggests strong protection following natural infection is short-lived   Andrew   From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org>
On Behalf Of Steve Shellhammer   Can’t support a non-scientific plan like this.   Suggesting that a person previously infected must get vaccinated is non-scientific.  I will stop there.   Regards, Steve   From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org>
On Behalf Of Jon Rosdahl   WARNING:
 This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Thanks Andrew, I agree it is a good plan that we could mimic. Jon 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Rosdahl                             Engineer, Senior Staff 
     On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:07 PM Andrew Myles (amyles) <00000b706269bb8b-dmarc-request@ieee.org> wrote: 
 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1  To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1  To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1  To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1 | ||||||