| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Colleagues, In regards to the proposed new FAQs, to record the comments I made during the PatCom meeting today: On the FAQ after #67: I view this FAQ to be a result of the proposed FAQ that I suggested at the December PatCom on identifying the exception, indicated in unchanged text on prohibitive orders, in the modified text of the 2023 patent policy. As I understand,
an accepted LOA is made under the patent policy that was in force at its acceptance. As there have been at least three instances of the patent policy, this FAQ should indicate that the explanation in the second paragraph is referring to the 2023 patent policy.
That is, change: Under the IEEE SA patent policy, … To Under the IEEE SA patent policy that took effect 1 January 2023,… On the FAQ after #93: The text may suggest that there have to be a few reasons together to update the patent policy, and I do not believe that is the case. So I suggest removing “number of”. That is, change: The IEEE SA may update the patent policy for any number of reasons, including but not limited to the fact that the previous text needed additional clarity, was duplicative, or was encompassed by other provisions in the
patent policy. To The IEEE SA may update the patent policy for any reason, including but not limited to the fact that the previous text needed additional clarity, was duplicative, or was encompassed by other provisions in the patent policy. Cheers, Glenn. -- Glenn Parsons IEEE-SA Board of Governors +1-514-379-9037 To unsubscribe from the PP-DIALOG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=PP-DIALOG&A=1 |