Date Index (Page 336 of 364)
- Motion P1788/M003.01_Set_of_reals open for VOTE
- From: Corliss, George
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Two kinds of interval arithmetic domains
- From: Michel Hack
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:15:14 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion P1788/M003.01_Set_of_reals YES
- From: Sylvain Pion
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:00:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [Reliable Computing] abs[x] for intervals? (reason for a standard)
- From: Sylvain Pion
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:59:12 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:08:40 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: Kreinovich, Vladik
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: John Pryce
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:55:25 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Reliable ComputingX absxX for intervals?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:00:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion P1788/M003.01_Set_of_reals
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Reliable ComputingÙ absxÙ for intervals?
- From: Corliss, George
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:18:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Motion 3
- From: Gerd Bohlender
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Reliable ComputingÙ absxÙ for intervals?
- From: Michel Hack
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [Reliable Computing] abs[x] for intervals? (reason for a standard)
- From: Corliss, George
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [Reliable Computing] abs[x] for intervals? (reason for a standard)
- From: Ian McIntosh
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:02:56 -0400 (EDT)
- Motion P1788/M003.01_Set_of_reals YES
- From: Iwona Skalna
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:37:50 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: Ian McIntosh
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:01:26 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [Reliable Computing] abs[x] for intervals? (reason for a standard)
- From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:31:31 -0400 (EDT)
- Motion 3
- From: Ulrich Kulisch
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: Ian McIntosh
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:54:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [Reliable Computing] abs[x] for intervals? (reason for a standard)
- From: Corliss, George
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:12:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [Reliable Computing] abs[x] for intervals? (reason for a standard)
- From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:35:40 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [Reliable Computing] abs[x] for intervals? (reason for a standard)
- From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:53:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
- From: Vincent Lefevre
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:47:58 -0400 (EDT)
Return to top of Page
Mail converted by MHonArc