RE: Our first formal motion
-----Original Message-----
From John Pryce
> Personally, I rarely use the standard meaning of \~ so I have redefined it to put its
> (single) argument in bold, so I use
> \~{x} which can be shortened to \~x
> to produce a boldface x. I would MUCH prefer intmacros.sty to do something like this,
> and abolish one-letter macros completely.
Bold could be done easier with \bf, what is proposed it bold italics not bold.
> C.
> HOWEVER please recall we are voting on a notation, not on a style file that implements > it. The latter can be improved in slow time. Please ignore it for the vote.
This is a new information to me, and probably to many other members of the list. I want to emphasize this.