Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

To: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:17:51 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C607C2EA.7386%George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Sensitivity: Normal

> I'm flexible on the details, but let's Keep It Simple.  Any language lawyers
> know how to state that?
Well said, again, George.
John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals

References:
- Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
  - From: Corliss, George

Prev by Date: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
Next by Date: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
Previous by thread: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
Next by thread: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread