Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

To: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
From: Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:59:47 -0700
Cc: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>, Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Comments: In-reply-to John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:17:51 +0100."
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090413101751.OPS4E.185038.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <20090413101751.OPS4E.185038.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:17:51 +0100
> From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
> 
> > I'm flexible on the details, but let's Keep It Simple.
> > Any language lawyers know how to state that?
> Well said, again, George.
> John

	I'll gladly second that. :-)  Very well said, George.  - Dan

References:
- Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
  - From: John Pryce

Prev by Date: Re: Motion P1788/M003.01_Set_of_reals
Next by Date: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
Previous by thread: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
Next by thread: Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread