Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: A proposal for the next motion

Dan
  we passed one flag with the scope of an interval expression
see the attached article submitted for SCAN 08 proceedings
Juergen

Dan Zuras Intervals schrieb:

Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:28:35 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=FCrgen_Wolff_v_Gudenberg?=
 <wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>, stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: A proposal for the next motion

Dan
  I find these ideas quite intersting.
in our (C++) software solution we played a little bit with 2 data types fo interval 
One : the normal type without tags for operands and storage
Two: A specific type for a result of an expression with tags.That saves some flags and can be handled quite efficiently (in software 

Juergen



	Well, don't keep us in suspense:  What did you find?
	What sort of things did you tag & what did you do with
	the information?  I have my own thoughts on the matter
	but you are the first person who's mentioned doing the
	experiment.  Do you think its worth the effort or not?  - Dan


--
=======
      o          Prof. Dr. J. Wolff v. Gudenberg,  Informatik 2
     / \         Univ. Wuerzburg,  Am Hubland,   D-97074 Wuerzburg
 info2 o        Tel.: +49 931 / 31-86602  Fax: +49 931 / 888-6603
   / \  Uni             e-mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  o   o Wuerzburg         http://www2.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/

Attachment: article.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document