Motion P1788/M0005.02_Table_of_operations NO
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I vote NO because:
I do not like the idea of providing "operational definitions" for
interval arithmetic. I would rather have "semantic definitions" as
already advocated by Prof. Neumaier. If we provide such kind of
definition for arithmetic operations, we should be bound to do the same
for all operations supported by the standard (which ones, BTW?), which,
IMHO, would greatly augment the complexity of the document.
FG.
- --
Frédéric Goualard LINA - UMR CNRS 6241
Tel.: +33 2 51 12 58 38 Univ. of Nantes - Ecole des Mines de Nantes
Fax.: +33 2 51 12 58 12 2, rue de la Houssinière - BP 92208
http://goualard.frederic.free.fr/ F-44322 NANTES CEDEX 3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFKpK0CEJvxJgN8HkgRAuGqAKCefnwpMRea2pmlTW+o9y/WdCmRPQCfaJ2v
spbe4Y+ALtZY6GM2rUeWsxE=
=gpiV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----