Motion P1788/M0006.04_Level_2_Multi-format NO
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
My vote is NO because the associated position paper definitely
assumes---even if peripherally---the implicit (e.g., [-oo, -oo] and
[+oo, +oo] have no meaning, which should make them NaIs, whatever that
object is) or explicit existence of NaIs, a concept I am not in favour of.
FG.
- --
Frédéric Goualard LINA - UMR CNRS 6241
Tel.: +33 2 51 12 58 38 Univ. of Nantes - Ecole des Mines de Nantes
Fax.: +33 2 51 12 58 12 2, rue de la Houssinière - BP 92208
http://goualard.frederic.free.fr/ F-44322 NANTES CEDEX 3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFKpLpmEJvxJgN8HkgRAtvPAKChtQ4LpVxlyIufyy5nG3MhORRdeQCguyHW
rVv62uwi1SvI8LGkbKaEIzc=
=Hb0S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----