Re: [Fwd: Re: [Reliable Computing] reliable_computing bug: Old, resolved emails still being posted]
Arnold,
I agree. I'm hoping someone will come forward.
Baker
Arnold Neumaier wrote:
R. Baker Kearfott wrote:
I don't know the answer to that.
But someone must know and should clarify.
If no one on this list knows, you need to make yourself knowledgable
on this.
Arnold Neumaier
Arnold Neumaier wrote:
I'd like to ask for clarification how/whether the existence of
patents should affect the standardization procedure, in which way the
(non)existence and/or contents of Letters of Assurance influences the
procedures at the various stages, and whether the Letters of Assurance
are open to list members or to the public (e.g. the Reliable
Computing mailing list).
This has nothing to do with speculations on the validity or strength
of patents, and should therefore be within the boundaries of
permitted discussion.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------