Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
From: Sylvain Pion <Sylvain.Pion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:39:07 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B03EFC9.4000304@xxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Organization: INRIA
References: <4B03EFC9.4000304@xxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)

I vote NO.

I am following Arnold Neumaier's rationale.

--
Sylvain Pion
INRIA Sophia-Antipolis
Geometrica Project-Team
CGAL, http://cgal.org/

References:
- Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
  - From: Gilles Chabert

Prev by Date: Exact vs correctly-rounded dot product
Next by Date: [Fwd: Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct]
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread