Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO

To: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
From: Mark Stadtherr <markst@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:59:47 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Organization: University of Notre Dame
Reply-to: markst@xxxxxx
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

I will change my vote to NO, based on arguments
from Corliss, Neumaier and other others in recent
days.

Mark Stadtherr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
  - From: Corliss, George

Prev by Date: Re: Exact vs correctly-rounded dot product
Next by Date: Re: Exact vs correctly-rounded dot product
Previous by thread: Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Next by thread: Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread