Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO

To: "markst@xxxxxx" <markst@xxxxxx>, "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
From: "Corliss, George" <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:36:16 -0600
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B042803.5060604@xxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcpocLFSEs7ALLQJRzubIYtlDbQapAAFbODX
Thread-topic: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.3.0.091002

  
 Received, with thanks


On 11/18/09 10:59 AM, "Mark Stadtherr" <markst@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I will change my vote to NO, based on arguments
> from Corliss, Neumaier and other others in recent
> days.
> 
> Mark Stadtherr

References:
- Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
  - From: Mark Stadtherr

Prev by Date: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Next by Date: Re: Exact vs correctly-rounded dot product
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread