Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO‏

To: stds-1788 IEEE <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO‏
From: Humberto Munoz <hmunoz40@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:30:11 +0000
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

 I will change my vote to NO, based on arguments from Kearfott, and Neumaier.

________________________

Humberto Muñoz

E-mail:hmunoz40@xxxxxxxxxxx

________________________

Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.

Prev by Date: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct: NO
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Previous by thread: Exact vs correctly-rounded dot product
Next by thread: UNOFFICIAL RESULTS: Motion 9 Exact dot product PASSES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread