Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Open voting?

To: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Open voting?
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:41:47 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B0656FD.4090106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Mail-followup-to: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
References: <C72B0669.3A5F%George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B0656FD.4090106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20-6029-vl-r30587 (2009-11-14)

On 2009-11-20 09:44:45 +0100, Sylvain Pion wrote:
> I prefer to keep all votes as now, on this list.  Discarding
> simple Yes/No votes is a no brainer and takes no time at all,
> compared to the bulk of the work of processing the other mails.

I agree. And I also prefer public votes.

> On a related matter, there should also be a Reply-To that
> points to this list as well...  This is much more annoying to me.

Please, no Reply-To to the list! Follow the standards!

http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open voting?
  - From: Lee Winter

References:
- Open voting?
  - From: Corliss, George
- Re: Open voting?
  - From: Sylvain Pion

Prev by Date: Re: Open voting?
Next by Date: Re: M0008.02_Exception_Handling
Previous by thread: Re: Open voting?
Next by thread: Re: Open voting?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread