Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

motion 15

P1788
shortly before the end of the discussion period I rebounce my concern about motion 15: 

> In my opinion Nate shows in his position paper that a properly
> defined tetrits value suffices to carry a decoration value (or
> property) through a computation. Inother words the "sticky"
> propagation of information is feasible.
> Hence motion 15 is obsolete !
> -- or am I missing the point?
> Juergen

Dan what are your plans with the motion ?
I think we shall first vote on tetrits vs octagits.
Nate, can you prepare such motion ?

regards
Juergen
--
-
     o          Prof. Dr. J. Wolff v. Gudenberg, Informatik II
    / \          Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg
InfoII o         Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602
  / \  Uni       E-Mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 o   o Wuerzburg