Motion 16: yes; Motion 17: yes
Since it is questionable whether or not a quorum will be
reached, I am voting (as acting chair) on these motions.
I vote "yes" on each.
Baker
P.S. Nonetheless, I think Nate has a point: it would
not hurt to make things clear enough to know easily whether
or not a particular implementation conforms.
On 6/27/2010 08:09, Corliss, George wrote:
According to my records, you have not voted on either
Motion 16.01 InfSup and MidRad
Motion 17.01 IO
Voting on both motions ends TODAY, Sunday, 2010-06-27
REMINDER, the voting period for Motion 16.01 InfSup and MidRad ends SUNDAY, 2010-06-27
Current tally: Yes - 23; No - 5; Needed to pass: 36 (1/2 of registered voters)
Baker's call is below.
REMINDER, the voting period for Motion 17.01 IO ends SUNDAY, 2010-06-27
Current tally: Yes - 26; No - 0; Needed to pass: 36 (1/2 of registered voters)
Baker's call is below.
REMINDER, the voting period for Motion 18.01Trits to Tetrits ends 2010-07-08
Current tally: Yes - 1; No - 0; Needed to pass: 36 (1/2 of registered voters)
Baker's call is below.
Dr. George F. Corliss
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Marquette University
P.O. Box 1881
1515 W. Wisconsin Ave
Milwaukee WI 53201-1881 USA
414-288-6599; GasDay: 288-4400; Fax 288-5579
George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.eng.mu.edu/corlissg
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------