Re: Is there a second? Re: Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework
Yes, indeed. The discussion should be interesting.
Baker
On 8/26/2010 1:27 PM, Dan Zuras Intervals wrote:
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:21:39 -0500
From: Ralph Baker Kearfott<rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: stds-1788<stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Is there a second? Re: Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework
P-1788,
Dominique has just submitted an interesting possible enhancement
of the basic comparison specifications in Motion 13.04 (presently
under discussion). Do I have a second, to begin formal discussion
of this extension / enhancement?
Baker
I confess I am still digesting Dominique's motion
but I will second it anyway. There are some
aspects of it that ingrigue me& I would like to
hear a discussion among those who know more about
it than I. - Dan
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------