Re: Position paper and motion on comparisons

[Dominique Lohez <dominique.lohez@xxxxxxx>]

Baker, Jûergen and all,

IMHO the position paper could be a good starting point to the choice of  
Interval Coparaison Binary relation  algebra 
announced in  Motion 20.0
Everything is provided the atomic relations ( the 13 states)  as well as 
the important relations ( the lattice comparisons )

I am more reluctant  about level 2 t detailed calculations. The method 
is really interesting and efficient.
However should such implementation considerations be present in the 
standard ?

Dominique

R. Baker Kearfott a écrit :
> Juergen (et al),
>
> Before I ask for a second, can you please clarify what P1788
> is being asked to provide.  In particular, is it being asked
> to provide a function on two intervals a and b whose range is
> precisely the set of 13 stated defined by tables 1 and 2?
>
> Baker
>
> On 9/1/2010 9:21 AM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
> > P1788
> > we have updated our position paper
> >
> > Interval Comparisons and Lattice Operations
> > based on the Interval Overlapping Relation
> >
> > see http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/PositionPapers/overlapping.pdf
> > or attachement
> >
> > based on that paper I move the following motion
> >
> > "P1788 should provide access to the states of the interval 
> > overlapping relation"
> >
> > This motion is to be understood as a supplement to motion 13.04.
> > The advantages are outlined in the position paper that serves as 
> > rationale for the motion.
> >
> > Juergen


--
Dr Dominique LOHEZ
ISEN
41, Bd Vauban
F59046 LILLE
France

Phone : +33 (0)3 20 30 40 71
Email: Dominique.Lohez@xxxxxxx