Re: Position paper and motion on comparisons
Baker
Yes such a function is necessary
Let me rephrase the motion tomake it clearer (hopefully)
Motion 21
"P1788 should provide access to the states of the interval overlapping
relation. In particular it should provide a function on two intervals a
and b whose range is the set of 13 states defined by tables 1 and 2.
Additionally the functionality of the abstract data type IOV described
by table 8 in section 5 of the position paper should be available.
For full flexibility the atomic operations shall be available as
comparisons, see Table 9."
Juergen
Am 02.09.2010 19:22, schrieb R. Baker Kearfott:
Juergen (et al),
Before I ask for a second, can you please clarify what P1788
is being asked to provide. In particular, is it being asked
to provide a function on two intervals a and b whose range is
precisely the set of 13 stated defined by tables 1 and 2?
Yes such a function is necessary
Baker
On 9/1/2010 9:21 AM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
P1788
we have updated our position paper
Interval Comparisons and Lattice Operations
based on the Interval Overlapping Relation
see http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/PositionPapers/overlapping.pdf
or attachement
based on that paper I move the following motion
"P1788 should provide access to the states of the interval overlapping
>> relation"
This motion is to be understood as a supplement to motion 13.04.
The advantages are outlined in the position paper that serves as
rationale for the motion.
Juergen
--
o Prof. Dr. Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg, Lehrstuhl fuer
Informatik II
/ \ Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg
InfoII o Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602
/ \ Uni E-Mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
o o Wuerzburg