Re: NO on Motion P1788/0019.01
> From: "Kreinovich, Vladik" <vladik@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:31:45 -0600
> Subject: NO on Motion P1788/0019.01
>
> I vote No on Motion 19
>
> Explanation: I like mid-rad representation, but it looks like
> Motion 19 contradicts Motion 16; this is what Arnold claims,
> and Dan seems to agree with this. If we vote for Motion 19
> without explicitly changing Motion 16, we will end up with an
> inconsistent set of approved motions.
There is no contradiction. Later motions modify earlier
motions. Still, your's is a reasonable objection which
we should have explored during the discussion period. - Dan