Re: Motions on comparisons
Baker,
we would appreciate a time-out until voting on motions 13 and 20 is
finished. We are preparing a streamlined new version according to John's
comments
See further comments in the text
Juergen
Ralph Baker Kearfott schrieb:
P-1788:
I note that there are three active motions on comparisons, two
of which give an explicit list of comparison operators:
1. Motion 13.04 gives seven comparison operators
2. Motion 21, which I have withheld for a day or two, gives
13 comparison operators.
motion 21 favors the 7 comparison operators of motion 13.04 as the user
interface
As an add on for specialists we suggest 13 primitive operators.
3. Motion 20 gives a theoretical framework for comparisons, and
some general operations on any comparisons (although I do not
fully grasp the implications at present).
In addition, Arnold Neumaier has been strongly advocating a set
of only three comparisons, but no-one has submitted a motion
to that effect yet.
Since, in my opinion, Motion 13.04 and Motion 21 give different
sets of comparison operators, I will not start voting on motion 21
until Motion 13 finishes. If both motions eventually succeed,
I will assume Motion 21 supersedes Motion 13.04.
If people prefer Arnold's simple set of three comparisons,
someone should make a motion that only these three comparisons
be included.
If anyone objects to this order of business, please post your
objection (or suggestion) either to the list or to me privately.
Sincerely,
Baker
--
-
o Prof. Dr. J. Wolff v. Gudenberg, Informatik II
/ \ Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg
InfoII o Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602
/ \ Uni E-Mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
o o Wuerzburg