Re: (OOPS) Motion P1788/0019.01: Explicit/Implicit idatatypes -- VOTING PERIOD ALSO BEGINS
Nate et al,
On 10/10/2010 13:05, Nate Hayes wrote:
.
.
.
It seems to me that even under this interpretation it will be a self-contradiction for P1788 to vote YES to both motions 19 and 23. So I guess I don't share your perspecive.
For example, if both motions pass, this seems to imply only non-midrad i-datatypes will be allowed in IEEE 1788. At least, that would be my interpretation.
What if general rules for implicit data types were spelled out, but mid-rad were not
explicitly mentioned in the standards document?
Baker
Nate
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------