Re: P-1788 officers -- Please give me advice
Baker
On 12 Oct 2010, at 17:49, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> My thinking at present is that I will withdraw Motion 23, keep Motion 19
> active, and let Dan use his judgment concerning moving a replacement
> to Motion 23. Perhaps the original positive formulation is better, since, if it
> fails, it still leaves room for the implicit type, into which other
> schemes can fit. Besides, as a position, it will impart sentiment, not
> actual standard verbiage.
>
> Do any of you have objections to the above plan?
I can't at present think of a better plan, but will keep pondering.
John