Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3



Michel Hack wrote:
Ian McIntosh wrote, partially agreeing with Nate Hayes' claim that
there is "NO way" to discuss level 2 without reference to level 3:
It also shows that you NEED to know some of the Level 3 details to
determine parts of the Level 2 abstract data type (eg, that Infinities
cannot have payloads - IF 754 had used different exponent field values
for NaNs versus Infinities, then Infinities could have had payloads).

Not so.  I have no difficulty at all understanding Level 2 on its own
terms, including determining the cardinality of its support set.

Michel,

I'm sure it was innocent on your part (and I agree the recent e-mails on this thread have been confusing at times), but just to set the record straight: it was John Pryce who made the claim there is "NO way" to discuss level 2 without reference to level 3, not me. I believe the claim is not true, and agree with your comment above.

Nate Hayes