Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3
Nate Hayes wrote:
> it was John Pryce who made the claim there is "NO way" to discuss...
Sorry, I must have miscounted the reply nesting level...
I just came back from vacation and plowed through several dozen
postings on the subject. Funnily enough, I found myself agreeing
alternately with John and with Nate, as both make valid points,
and the differences are subtle. On balance I think I'm closer to
Nate's position, though I can see where John's abstractions are
coming from. I suspect both arguments are missing some pieces.
I think Dan Zuras found the missing piece in Nate's argument:
> And how will you know that an exception has occured
> on a bare interval?
The discussion of this seems to have started, but just barely...
Michel.
---Sent: 2010-10-26 18:37:48 UTC