Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3

To: "stds-1788" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Michel Hack" <hack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3
From: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:10:37 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201010261838.o9QIcbES023702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Organization: Sunfish Studio, LLC
References: <201010261838.o9QIcbES023702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Michel Hack wrote:

I think Dan Zuras found the missing piece in Nate's argument:

 And how will you know that an exception has occured
 on a bare interval?


The discussion of this seems to have started, but just barely...

It appears Arnold and myself will be providing some clarifications aroundthis issue in our upcoming position paper.


Nate Hayes

References:
- Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3
  - From: Michel Hack

Prev by Date: PLEASE VOTE M00019.02
Next by Date: Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3
Previous by thread: Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3
Next by thread: Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums) - level 2 versus level 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread