Re: Motion P1788/M0021.2: NO

[John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12 Dec 2010, at 11:55, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> I vote NO on motion P1788/M0021.2.
> 
> The system seemed elegant to me at first. But when I tried to apply it
> to some of my use cases, I soon become overwhelmed trying to figure
> which subsets of the partition were corresponding to the relations I
> wanted to express. In the end, it seemed faster and less error-prone to
> go back to just comparing bounds. My feeling is that most users will
> experience the same situation, causing the feature to just bloat the
> standard if it goes unused, hence my vote.

Thanks Guillaume, that's the sort of experimenting we need.
John Pryce