Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0024.02: Yes

To: "P-1788" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion P1788/M0024.02: Yes
From: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:04:09 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Organization: Sunfish Studio, LLC
Reply-to: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

I vote yes for Motion 24.02.

The way I read the motion, it only requires the 8 operations are provided.
Language, library and hardware vendors are free to choose the namining
taxonomy as well as the nature of the implementation.

Nate

Prev by Date: Hardware?
Next by Date: Re: I vote NO on Motion P1788/M0024.02:RoundedOperations
Previous by thread: Motion 24.02 No
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0024.02: Yes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread