Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2).eml 3rd attempt

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2).eml 3rd attempt
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:51:12 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4DF210AC.8010404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <4DF210AC.8010404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Jürgen

On 10 Jun 2011, at 13:40, J. Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
> John
>  here are some comments on your position paper
Thanks, I'll respond shortly to your thoughtful comments.

John

References:
- Re Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2).eml 3rd attempt
  - From: J. Wolff von Gudenberg

Prev by Date: Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
Next by Date: Re: As simple as it is now, I am still against motion 24.03...
Previous by thread: Re Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2).eml 3rd attempt
Next by thread: Fwd: Re: Re Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2).eml final
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread