Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)

To: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:54:48 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4DF21873.6020604@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <8DA4C2F8-260A-4DD3-86D3-D2C539EFAC1E@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DF1FE03.202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DF21873.6020604@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Baker

On 10 Jun 2011, at 14:13, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> John:  Did you wish this to be treated as a formal motion, to be seconded?
>       Also, voting is scheduled to start on Motion 25 (with amendment) after
>       June 13.  Do you wish to start voting on your paper, or to postpone
>       voting to allow further time for discussion?
Sorry for slow response, yes I would like to postpone voting pending further discussion

John

References:
- Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
  - From: John Pryce
- Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
  - From: J. Wolff von Gudenberg
- Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott

Prev by Date: Some questions and "typos" regarding Motion 26
Next by Date: Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2).eml 3rd attempt
Previous by thread: Re: I still need a second for John's paper Re: Any objections? Re: John's position paper simultaneously with Nate's
Next by thread: Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread