Re: Four vs. five decorations
Nate Hayes a écrit :
so for the sake of keeping discussion focused, I attach a PDF
addressing my thoughts only on the first of these two issues. I'll give
examples later addressing the topic of bare decorations.
IMHO the touble with set operators lies that as noted their behavior
depends on extra information.
So the position of Arnold Neumaier may be valid if the stated
conditions hold.
However these conditions are very restrictive.
Keeping these operators should be
So either a way to use the conclusion only in the good context can be found
Or a very poor version of the set operators must be kept so that the
precept
Thou shan't lie is followed
On may then think like John that the set operators must be omitted
Sincerely
Dominique
Sincerely,
Nate
--
Dr Dominique LOHEZ
ISEN
41, Bd Vauban
F59046 LILLE
France
Phone : +33 (0)3 20 30 40 71
Email: Dominique.Lohez@xxxxxxx